Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/85/8979285/html/wp-includes/post-thumbnail-template.php:1) in /home/content/85/8979285/html/wp-content/plugins/wp-super-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 62
Grading the 'Boys in 2010, Part I: Tight Ends | The DC Times

The DC Times

A New Way to Look at the Cowboys, NFL, and Fantasy Football


Grading the ‘Boys in 2010, Part I: Tight Ends

Subscribe to The DC Times
Never miss a post again!

Jonathan Bales

Last season, I graded every player on the Cowboys (who got a sufficient number of snaps) on their overall performance.  I called it “Grading the ‘Boys,” and enough of you seemed to like it for it to return this year.  Remember that these grades are based on efficiency, not total production.  We start with the tight ends. . .

Tight end is a rather difficult position to grade due to the varying nature of the positional responsibilities.  The league-wide transition to a spread offense has, on many teams, morphed the tight end position from one of versatility (a combination of strength and finesse) into pure finesse.  Great blocking tight ends are often passed over in favor of athletic pass-catchers.

On the Cowboys, however, versatility is still king among the tight ends.  If you can’t block, you can’t play tight end for the Dallas Cowboys.  I personally am glad the Cowboys seek versatility in their tight ends, as it is the characteristic which makes them so valuable.  A defense can implement their nickel personnel to effectively limit the production of a tight end who cannot block well.  The reason tight ends like Jason Witten are so efficient is that their blocking ability forces defenses to stay in their base personnel, providing the offense with mismatches.

Due to the method by which the team employs its tight ends, I will weight the players’ blocking and pass-catching grades equally.  This grading system may not be suitable for a team which uses its tight ends in a different manner, such as the Washington Redskins (yes, that was a knock on Chris Cooley’s blocking ability), but for the Cowboys it is the most accurate way to determine the overall ability of Jason Witten, Martellus Bennett, and John Phillips.  A few of the stats (YAC and pressures/hits yielded) were provided by Pro Football Focus.


  • Jason Witten

Blocking:  B+

Witten struggled a bit in the run game early in the 2010 season, but he picked it up later in the year.  His sub-par blocking and limited production in the passing game makes me wonder if he was playing hurt to begin the 2010 campaign.  Either way, Witten quickly returned to usual form.

He yielded two sacks on the season, but not a single quarterback hit or pressure.  Although it may seem as though Witten is always out in a route on pass plays, that’s actually not the case.  Witten stayed in to block on 23.8 percent of passes in 2010, up slightly from 22.9 percent in 2009.  You can see to the left that the Cowboys were slightly more effective with Witten blocking as opposed to in a route, reversing a trend from last season (when the offense averaged nearly two full yards more when Witten was in a route).

Witten also cut his penalty rate down from 11 (in 2009) to five.

Receiving: A

Last season, I provided Witten with an “A-” receiving grade.  This year, his numbers are nearly identical, but he recorded seven more touchdowns (nine total) and half the drops (only three in 2010).  Witten is still below average after the catch (he averaged only 4.1 YAC/reception this season), but his 76.4 percent reception rate is stellar.

The increase in touchdowns should come as no surprise.  Last season, I wrote this in my “Grading the ‘Boys: Tight Ends” segment:

Expect Witten’s touchdown number to increase quite significantly in 2010.  Touchdowns can sometimes be a fluky statistic, and there is nothing inherent in Witten’s game that should make him unable to score.  With the loss of oft-dominating run-blocker left tackle Flozell Adams and the team likely to provide running back Marion Barber with less goal line touches, Witten should see a spike in scoring opportunities.

  • Martellus Bennett

Blocking: A-

Cowboys fans may be unhappy with Bennett’s production as a receiver, but he was dominant as a blocker again in 2010.  He didn’t allow a single sack and yielded only one hit and two pressures, despite being utilized as a blocker on the majority of his snaps.  I was quoted as saying I would rather put Bennett at right tackle than Marc Colombo, and that is still true.  He’s even better in the run game.

Receiving: B-

Bennett improved upon his 2009 receiving campaign by catching 75.0 percent of balls thrown his way (up from 51.7 percent last season).  That rate is right alongside Witten’s.  His 5.6 YAC/reception is also quite impressive, but his three drops (in 44 attempts) is too many.

The Cowboys may want to look at making Bennett more of a focal point in 2011, as he possesses the skill set to become a tremendous all-around tight end.  Right now, the largest reason he is considered a “bust” by fans is simply because he doesn’t receive many opportunities as a pass-catcher.  With Witten getting older, look for Bennett to receive closer to 70 looks next season.

Overall Tight End Grades

1.  Jason Witten: A- (91.0)

  • 2009 Grade: A- (93.0)

2.  Martellus Bennett:  B+ (88.0)

  • 2009 Grade: B- (80.0)
Be Sociable, Share!

18 Responses to Grading the ‘Boys in 2010, Part I: Tight Ends

  1. john coleman says:

    I appreciate the perspective and breakdown. It’s hard to believe how many people are still trashing Bennett. Your breakdown here brings light to the FACT that all he needs is more opportunities. People never see blocking.

  2. Frank says:

    Dallas should have the best set of TEs in the league next year. Witten is the best, bennett nit far behind and improving, and Phillips looked great last year in preseason. At least here is one position that is set for 2011.

  3. starred4life says:

    Thanks for this. I just tried to find these exact stats while defending Bennett to a bunch of ingrates on the Cowboys’ site. I couldn’t find the stat for dropped passes by him. The way everyone was bashing him, they made it sound like it was a major issue. Three is not that bad, even if it was out of 44.

  4. VINCE GREY says:

    Witten definitely picked it up this year. I really thought he was fading fast, mainly because of all the false start penalties in 2009. I thought he was slowing down to the point he had to “cheat” in order to get free, and you usually don’t come back from that, but JW did.

    Of course, time still marches on. He’s not the down field, break-away threat he was early in his career, but he’s a complete player and still performing at a high level.

    I LOVE MB’s blocking, and I agree that he could have likely done a better job at RT than Columbo, even at an unheard of 260-270 pounds (For a RT). I still think there’s a great pass-catching TE in there somewhere. Just don’t know when we’ll ever see it.

  5. JC–I’d say Bennett isn’t the only player on the Cowboys who just needs more opportunities, but he’s probably the most physically talented.

    Frank–You’re probably right. It’s too bad Phillips/Bennett have very little trade value or the ‘Boys could acquire a nice pick/player.

    Starred–You’re right, and Bennett’s drops aren’t the result of a lack of athleticism. He has good hands, and drops are actually an overrated stat anyway. I’ll try to find the numbers, but they don’t hurt you as much as you might think. He had WAY more last season (dropped 25.0 percent of balls I believe), so he’s improving.

  6. Vince–Really not sure we’ll see it since there again trade rumors surrounding Bennett. I really hope he doesn’t go because I don’t think the value will be there.

  7. Scott says:

    nice. I agree on Bennett. He is always getting called a bust with some fans wanting to cut or at least trade him because expectations for him were so high and blocking doesn’t show up in highlights, but I’m glad to see the numbers back it up that he is a solid TE, very good in blocking and not bad in his receiving with the limited opportunities he is given. I do think he’ll be a bigger part of the offense next season and will continue to develop his route running and awareness of the offense to become more of a direct contributor to production.

  8. Scott–I sure hope Bennett becomes a larger part of the offense, but you still have Bryant, Austin, Witten, and Jones to feed ahead of him. Unfortunately for him, his largest contributions to the team (blocking) will always go unnoticed by most.

  9. Pingback: Grading the 'Boys in 2010, Part III: Inside Linebackers | Dallas Cowboys Times

  10. moses says:

    I agree.

    Bennett gets trashed because he isn’t out there catching passes for TDs. Nobody sees how effective he is in blocking.

    It’s too that the Cowboys don’t use his blocking skills to better use

  11. Pingback: Cowboys 2010 Playaction Pass Analysis: Spread vs Tight Formations | Dallas Cowboys Times

  12. Pingback: Grading the 'Boys in 2010, Part VII: Offensive Line | Dallas Cowboys Times

  13. Pingback: Grading the 'Boys in 2010, Part VIII: Wide Receivers | Dallas Cowboys Times

  14. Pingback: Grading the 'Boys in 2010, Part X: Quarterbacks | Dallas Cowboys Times

  15. Pingback: Dallas Cowboys Times' Final 2010 Player, Position Rankings | Dallas Cowboys Times

  16. Pingback: Dallas Cowboys Player Rankings: How Does Current Roster Affect 2011 Draft Plans? « Top Sports Hub

  17. Pingback: How Dallas Cowboys Player Rankings Should Affect 2011 Draft Prep | Dallas Cowboys Times

  18. Pingback: Dallas Cowboys 53-Man Roster Projection | Dallas Cowboys Times

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *