Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/85/8979285/html/wp-includes/post-thumbnail-template.php:1) in /home/content/85/8979285/html/wp-content/plugins/wp-super-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 62
Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett's Play-Calling | The DC Times

The DC Times

A New Way to Look at the Cowboys, NFL, and Fantasy Football


Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett’s Play-Calling

Subscribe to The DC Times
Never miss a post again!

Jonathan Bales

Over the years, I have detailed much of the predictability within Jason Garrett’s play-calling.  Everyone here knows about the frequency of strong side dives from “Double Tight Strong,” the lack of efficient playaction passes, the predictable 2nd down play-calling, and so on.  I often discuss how the goal of any offensive coordinator is to fool the defense and ultimately exploit a mismatch, and predictability can really kill one’s ability to do that.

One thing I do not discuss as often, however, is how predictability can be useful to an offense.  When used properly, an offensive coordinator can take advantage of previous tendencies to garner big plays for his team.  Well, I took a look at this idea in a recent article for Advanced NFL Stats. Head over there to take a gander, and feel free to comment there or here.

As it relates to Dallas, Garrett does not seem to take advantage of his tendencies.  He has dialed up a deep pass on less than 5% of passes from “Double Tight Strong” over the past 39 games, and only eight (EIGHT!) playaction passes since the start of the 2009 season have come with 1-4 yards to go for a 1st down–a time when defenses are likely anticipating a run.  Actually, more playaction passes (11) have come with 20+ yards to go.  Garrett is surely leaving a lot of potential yards out there due to an inability to capitalize on specific scenarios which create favorable defensive expectations.

“Double Tight Strong” and other run-oriented formations are specifically good options from which to pass.  A playaction look from the formation on 2nd and 1, for example, forces the defense to line up with base or “heavier” personnel, perhaps call a play to stop the run, think the run is coming due to the playaction look, and then potentially get beat deep. . .except Garrett isn’t calling playaction passes from the formation.

The goal of NFL coaches is to maximize the chance of success for their team, and until Garrett abandons the concept that his players are so well-coached and talented that they can execute any play at any time, the Cowboys will continue to lose football games they should be winning.

Dallas Cowboys Times is on Twitter.

Subscribe to our free e-mail updates.

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to Predictability Remains in Jason Garrett’s Play-Calling

  1. bW says:


    would you also factor Romo in the thought process of not passing or play action passing from this formation? it seems to me that Romo kills a lot of plays at the line of scrimmage. Could it be that it may be a pass called out of that formation but Romo sees something he doesn’t like and kills it to a run?

    I’d be curious to know if you track when/how often Romo kills plays in genral.

  2. I do. Here are Romo’s audible numbers over the past two years. http://dallascowboystimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Romo-Kitna-2010-Audibles.jpg

    Romo very often checks to a draw when a team is in Cover 2, although this really isn’t his choice, as the play is called in the huddle. When the Cowboys are in DTS, the defense is usually in base or heavier personnel. . .if a pass is called, Romo rarely checks out of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *