The DC Times

A New Way to Look at the Cowboys, NFL, and Fantasy Football

By Jonathan Bales

2013 NFL Left Tackle Rankings: Tyron Smith in Top 10

At Dallas News, I used stats to rank the league’s best left tackles. Here are my top 10:

A few weeks ago, I posted an article from Pete Prisco that ranks the NFL’s best players at four important positions: quarterback, pass-rusher, cornerback, and left tackle. Since that time, I’ve published my own top 15 rankings for the quarterbackspass-rushers, and cornerbacks.

Today, I’ll turn my attention to the left tackles. As with the other positions, age will play a major role in my rankings. At just 22 years old and heading into his third NFL season, history suggests that Cowboys left tackle Tyron Smith is on the verge of becoming a Pro Bowl-caliber player. Is he better than someone like Titans left tackle Michael Roos right at this moment? Probably not, but at nine years his younger, you’d probably prefer Smith long-term.

Also note that I really don’t care about how many sacks a lineman allows. That might seem ridiculous since the goal for anyone in pass protection is to keep the quarterback upright, but sacks are extremely volatile, meaning it’s almost worthless to grade an offensive lineman using the stat. I tracked Smith as allowing only three sacks in 2012, for example, but based on how often he allowed pressure, his most likely sack total was actually nine. If we were to use those three sacks to grade Smith for his 2012 play alone, he’d probably rank higher than he should. The goal when projecting players is to search for stats that are predictive of future play, however, and pressure rates are more predictive than sacks because they’re less susceptible to randomness.

Finally, quarterback play is also a factor in my rankings. I’ve used stats from Pro Football Focus on the average time each quarterback spent in the pocket prior to each pass. It should be no surprise that Tom Brady and Peyton Manning got rid of the ball quicker than any other quarterbacks in 2012, both throwing in 2.50 seconds or less, on average. Quarterbacks can really aid their linemen in sack and pressure rates; Broncos left tackle Ryan Clady allowed just one sack in 2012, for example, but he also benefited from perhaps the quickest decision-making quarterback in the NFL. Tony Romo makes a ton of plays with his legs, but he spends a lot of time in the pocket, which doesn’t help Smith’s numbers.

Below, I’ve listed my top left tackles heading into 2013. The number behind their names is their age when the 2013 season begins. I’ve listed sacks allowed and pressure rate, with the latter stat being a stronger factor in my rankings.

2013 NFL Left Tackle Rankings

1. Joe Thomas, Browns (28): 3 sacks allowed, 1.6 percent pressure rate

2. Russell Okung, Seahawks (25): 1 sack allowed, 2.7 percent pressure rate

3. Duane Brown, Texans (28): 4 sacks allowed, 2.0 percent pressure rate

4. Ryan Clady, Broncos (27): 1 sack allowed, 2.3 percent pressure rate

5. Matt Kalil, Vikings (24): 2 sacks allowed, 3.3 percent pressure rate

6. Jake Long, Rams (28): 4 sacks allowed, 2.4 percent pressure rate

7. Trent Williams, Redskins (25): 4 sacks allowed, 3.6 percent pressure rate

8. Tyron Smith, Cowboys (22): 3 sacks allowed, 6.0 percent pressure rate

9. Eugene Monroe, Jaguars (26): 5 sacks allowed, 3.2 percent pressure rate

10. Joe Staley, 49ers (29): 8 sacks allowed, 3.3 percent pressure rate

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys should force offenses to run the ball

At Dallas News, I explained why the Cowboys should do everything they can to force teams to run the ball this year.

Since the ‘Boys will already be one of the lighter defenses in the NFL, it will be interesting to see how Kiffin uses his sub-packages. Namely, I want to see how often the Cowboys use their base personnel—all three linebackers—when offenses line up with “11” personnel. If you recall, “11” personnel is one running back, one tight end, and three receivers.

In 2012, the Cowboys ranked in the middle of the pack in terms of employing base personnel versus “11.” Per Football Outsiders, Dallas used their base package on 7.4 percent of snaps against “11.” That might sound low, but it was actually the 16th-highest in the NFL.

With three good coverage linebackers on the field, Kiffin might be tempted to stay in base quite often, even against three-receiver sets. I think the Cowboys should work to continue to decrease their base usage, however. Even against an offense’s base personnel (whether it’s “12” or “21”), the Cowboys should try to entice teams to run the football. In most situations, running is a sub-optimal strategy to passing. If the ‘Boys can get offenses to continually run the ball against them on first-and-10, that’s advantageous. Even with undersized personnel, it should benefit the defense to do everything they can to get the ball out of the hands of opposing quarterbacks.

By Jonathan Bales

Ranking the NFL’s Top 15 Cornerbacks

At Dallas News, I ranked the NFL’s top 15 cornerbacks:

Cornerbacks are often ranked by YPA (yards per attempt), but I think that’s a poor metric. When Nnamdi Asmougha was in his prime in Oakland, he was targeted about half as often as other top cornerbacks, but he gave up a high completion rate and YPA because quarterbacks threw at him only when they knew his guy was wide open.

To truly capture great cornerback play, I think you need to reward them for not getting targeted. That’s why yards allowed per coverage snap is the best way to grade cornerbacks. Tracked by Pro Football Focus, yards per coverage snap reflects a cornerback’s solid coverage on a play, regardless of whether or not he was targeted.

Below, I’ve ranked my top 15 cornerbacks. Yards per coverage snap (listed) was one of the main stats I considered, but not the only one. I also think there’s a ton of value in play-making ability. While interceptions are fairly volatile, some cornerbacks have proven capable of making more plays than others even over large sample sizes. That’s why Asante Samuel is rated in my top five despite an average mark in yards per coverage snap, for example; he’s demonstrated a consistent ability to haul in interceptions (and he actually doesn’t give up a lot of big plays), and there’s a ton of value in that.

NFL Cornerback Rankings

1. Darrelle Revis, Jets

  • 0.92 yards per target (2011)

2. Richard Sherman, Seahawks

  • 1.07 yards per snap

3. Antonio Cromartie, Jets

  • 0.97 yards per snap

4. Champ Bailey, Broncos

  • 0.82 yards per snap (best in NFL)

5. Asante Samuel, Falcons

  • 1.27 yards per snap

6. Patrick Peterson, Cardinals

  • 1.24 yards per snap

7. Charles Tillman, Bears

  • 1.04 yards per snap

8. Prince Amukamara, Giants

  • 0.86 yards per snap (second in NFL)

See where Brandon Carr checks in.

By Jonathan Bales

DeMarcus Ware and the NFL’s Top Pass-Rushers

At Dallas News, I attempted to rank the league’s best pass-rushers.

The best way to predict future sacks actually isn’t past sacks, but rather the rate at which a player has reached the quarterback. If you know how many snaps a pass-rusher will rush the quarterback and how often he can pressure him, you can make a really accurate prediction regarding sack totals. That means that pressure rate is even better than total sacks as a tool to grade pass-rushers.

The rankings represent which players I’d want on my team moving forward. That means age is a major consideration; DeMarcus Ware is still an amazing player, but 24-year old Jason Pierre-Paul is probably a better option in the future, even if he’s not a superior player at this moment.

1. Von Miller, Broncos

  • 18.5 sacks, 10.4 percent pressure rate, age 24

2. Aldon Smith, 49ers

  • 19.5 sacks, 5.7 percent pressure rate, age 23

3. J.J. Watt, Texans

  • 20.5 sacks, 4.4 percent pressure rate, age 24

4. Jason Pierre-Paul, Giants

  • 6.5 sacks, 8.4 percent pressure rate, age 24

5. Clay Matthews, Packers

  • 13 sacks, 5.5 percent pressure rate, age 27

6. Mario Williams, Bills

  • 10.5 sacks, 7.1 percent pressure rate, age 28

See where Ware fits in right here.

By Jonathan Bales

Bill Callahan’s Play-Calling History, Tendencies

At Dallas Morning News, I revisited Bill Callahan’s history as a play-caller.

In Callahan’s first year as the Raiders’ offensive coordinator, Oakland posted poor offensive statistics. They checked in at 21st in the NFL in points, primarily because they turned over the football more often than all but two teams. They also ranked only 18th in rushing efficiency and 25th in passing efficiency.

By Callahan’s second season, however, the Raiders were on their way to creating an offense that would be among the league’s best in a number of categories for the next four seasons. From 1999 to 2002, Callahan’s Raiders averaged the following ranks:

  • Net yards-per-attempt: 6th (Best: 3rd, Worst: 8th)
  • Yards-per-carry: 12th (Best: 3rd, Worst: 26th)
  • Points: 4th (Best: 2nd, Worst: 8th)
  • Giveaways: 6th (Best: 2nd, Worst: 12th)

Those are some pretty darn good numbers over a four-year period; the Raiders never ranked worse than 8th in points or net-YPA. In his final season in Oakland, however, Callahan’s offense took asteep drop. They finished 29th in net-YPA—down from 3rd just one year prior—13th in YPC, 26th in points, and 11th in giveaways.

In charting Callahan’s ranks while in Oakland, it’s easy to see that he led an above-average offense for quite some time. Callahan’s tenure in Oakland was bookended by two poor showings, likely leaving a bad taste in the mouths of Raiders fans and even those around the league.

It’s also interesting to see just how closely the Raiders’ rank in net-YPA resembles their final rank in points. If you recall, I’ve argued on numerous occasions that net-YPA is the most important individual stat in all of football. It’s actually a better predictor of future points even than past points scored, which is remarkable. It’s not really too much of a surprise that as the Raiders’ passing game thrived, they scored points. Meanwhile, Oakland ranked 26th in YPC in a season in which they scored the fourth-most points in the NFL and 13th in a season when they ranked second in points.

So yeah, let’s keep saying the Cowboys need to blindly run the ball.

In addition to his successes as a play-caller, I also examined some of Callahan’s tendencies:

54.1: Percentage of first downs on which the Raiders ran the ball

The Raiders ran the ball quite a bit on first down from 2000 to 2003. Their first-down run rate was even higher than the league average of 52.4 percent during that time. The Raiders’ first-down run rate through three quarters (54.5 percent) was even greater, suggesting Callahan really does like to attack on the ground early.

55.9: Raiders’ pass rate in all situations

In general, though, the Raiders passed the ball about as often as the average NFL team. Their overall pass rate through the first three quarters of games (56.3 percent) was slightly higher.

17.3: Raiders’ pass rate on 2nd and 1

Few coaches realize the value of 2nd and 1—a down and distance that holds maximum upside without much risk. Smart teams like the Saints often run play-action and throw deep on 2nd and 1 because they realize that the downside of an incompletion is minimal. Callahan is one of the coaches who has tended to run on 2nd and 1 to pick up the “sure thing.” From 2000 to 2003, the Raiders faced 75 plays on 2nd and 1 and passed on just 13 of them.

68.8: Percentage of 2nd and 10 plays on which Oakland passed

When a team faces 2nd and 10, it’s often because they threw an incomplete pass on first down. A lot of play-callers tend to run the ball on 2nd and 10 following an incompletion because they think they’re “mixing it up.” In their futile attempts to randomize their play-calling, however, coaches actually become quite predictable on 2nd and 10. In 2003, NFL teams passed the ball only 55.8 percent of the time on 2nd and 10; that’s around the same as the overall rate in a situation in which teams should be passing a whole lot more often, regardless of the previous call.

Callahan’s Raiders passed the ball much more frequently on 2nd and 10 than most teams, though, suggesting Callahan could be superior to Jason Garrett as a “randomizer” of plays.

By Jonathan Bales

A Look Back at My 2012 Preseason Predictions

I think every writer and football analyst should make predictions. Most agree. But here’s a crazy idea: we should examine those predictions at the end of the season. Then we might be able to see who knows what the hell they’re talking about and who will continue to repeat that the Cowboys need to run the ball more if they want to win.

My obsession with predictions is why I make so many before the season and why I’ve openly published my game picks (you know, before the games actually happen) right here for the past three years. At Dallas News, I posted every one of my 2012 preseason predictions that I could find. Many were right. Some were wildly wrong.

Looking back at 2012, it was a pretty good year of predictions for me. Here they are:

Dez Bryant Will Be True No. 1 in 2012

Prediction: Bryant will have a 63.0 percent catch rate, 125 targets, 15.5 YPC, 1,224 yards, and 11 touchdowns.

Result: Bryant surpassed my expectations, slightly, with a 67.2 percent catch rate on 137 targets, 15.0 YPC, 1,382 yards, and 12 touchdowns.

Martellus Bennett Could Be Missed in 2012

Prediction: The loss of Bennett—one of the league’s best blocking tight ends—will hurt the running game.

Result: There are lots of reasons the Cowboys’ running game suffered in 2012, but much of it had to do with Bennett’s departure.

DeMarco Murray Won’t Rush for 1,500 Yards

Prediction: Murray will total between 950 and 1,050 rushing yards.

Result: Due to missing six games, Murray rushed for only 663 yards. Otherwise, he was on pace for 1,061.

Jay Ratliff’s Best Days for Cowboys Behind Him

Prediction: Ratliff will have just 20 tackles and two sacks in 2012.

Result: Ratliff ended the season with 10 tackles and zero sacks in six games.

Cowboys’ Interior Line Will Struggle in 2012

Prediction: The Cowboys’ guards and center will struggle at the point-of-attack.

Result: Exactly that.

Jason Witten’s Decline Inevitable

Prediction: Witten’s production will remain stable in 2012 before dropping substantially in 2013.

Result: In terms of receptions, Witten had an historic season. However, he also scored only three times and had the worst efficiency of his career in terms of both YPC and yards per route. We’ll see if his bulk production does indeed dip this year.

Why Barry Church Is Ready to Start at Safety

Prediction: Church will have a strong year as a starter.

Result: Injured in Week 3, we never really saw much of the safety.

Why Tony Romo Will Throw It Deep in 2012

Prediction: Romo’s deep ball rate will increase, perhaps to 15.0 percent.

Result: Romo did throw more deep passes than ever, but his rate—10.8 percent—didn’t increase much over previous seasons.

5 Bold Predictions for Cowboys’ Offense

Predictions: Dez Bryant will lead the NFL in touchdowns, Tyron Smith will allow fewer than four sacks, Jason Witten won’t top 850 receiving yards, DeMarco Murray will catch over 50 passes, and the Cowboys will win the NFC East.

Results: Bryant was second in the NFL in touchdown receptions—one behind Eric Decker, Smith allowed only three sacks, Witten had 1,039 yards with a career-high in targets, Murray was on pace for 56 receptions before getting injured, and the Cowboys clearly didn’t win the NFC East.

You can see more of my predictions right here.

By Jonathan Bales

Ranking the NFL’s Top 15 Quarterbacks

At Dallas Morning News, I took a shot at using stats to rank the league’s top quarterbacks. Here are my top eight:

Pete Prisco recently released his top players at the four positions he considers to be most vital in the NFL: quarterback, pass-rusher, cornerback, and left tackle. Based solely on those positions, the Cowboys checked in as the second-best overall team with Tony Romo ranked at No. 9, DeMarcus Ware at No. 3, Brandon Carr at No. 11, and Tyron Smith at No. 8.

For the most part, I think Prisco did a decent job with his rankings. Still, there are points of contention, so I wanted to propose my own “four-pronged” rankings from the perspective of a stat geek. Using advanced stats, I’ll put forth my top 15 players at each of the four positions, starting today with quarterback.

To be clear, I’m ranking the players not based off of what they’ve done in the past, but rather how likely they are to succeed in the future. I don’t really care if Joe Flacco won a Super Bowl last year; that doesn’t affect his ability to win future championships all that much. The best stats or power rankings are the most predictive, so consider this list my prediction for the most likely quarterbacks to thrive in the future.

1. Aaron Rodgers, Packers

  • 7.8 YPA in 2012 and it was his worst mark in four years

2. Tom Brady, Patriots

  • 0.29 WPA/game ranked him third in the NFL.

3. Drew Brees, Saints

  • A down year and still top six in YPA

4. Peyton Manning, Broncos

  • 7.49 net-YPA was first in NFL; would be higher if not for age

5. Cam Newton, Panthers

  • Third in YPA, seventh in net-YPA; 1,447 yards and 22 TDs rushing in two seasons

6. Robert Griffin III, Redskins

  • Health a concern, but best passer rating against the blitz in NFL history

7. Matt Ryan, Falcons

  • Second-highest completion rate in NFL; top five in net-YPA

8. Andrew Luck, Colts

  • Somewhat overrated rookie season; outside of top 15 in YPA and net-YPA

By Jonathan Bales

Can Anthony Spencer total 12 sacks in 2013?

At Dallas News, I analyzed whether or not Anthony Spencer can reach his projected total of 12 sacks this season.

The Numbers

Spencer rushed the passer on 318 snaps in 2012. Compare that to 454 for DeMarcus Ware. Based on pass-rushing rates for other 4-3 defensive ends around the league, Spencer is probably in store for around 500 opportunities to bring down the quarterback in 2013—a substantial jump over previous years.

In 2012, Spencer had 27 pressures and his 11 sacks represented 40.7 percent of that total. I’ve found that sack rates tend to hover closer to 25 percent over the long run, meaning Spencer got lucky to record 11 sacks last season.

However, Spencer has traditionally pressured the quarterback more than 27 times. Over the last three seasons, Spencer’s pressure rate is 7.9 percent, i.e. he’s pressured the quarterback about once every 13 snaps that he’s rushed.

With those numbers, it’s pretty easy to project Spencer’s 2013 sack total. With 500 snaps as a rusher, Spencer should pressure the quarterback around 40 times (500 * 7.9 percent). If he converts one-quarter of those pressures into sacks, he’s looking at 10 sacks.

What I Like

Spencer’s primary strength is his run defense. He’s been one of the league’s premiere run defenders for years, racking up 158 solo tackles since 2010. He played 1,122 snaps against the run, representing a 14.1 percent tackle rate.

By Jonathan Bales

Why Cowboys’ defense will be improved in 2013

At Dallas News, I discussed one aspect of the Cowboys’ new defense that I like.

The Cowboys’ defense played horribly for much of the 2012 season. Whether it was due to a rash of injuries or poor defensive play-calling, the ‘Boys ranked 24th in points allowed, net-YPA allowed, andYPC allowed. They also checked in with a league-low seven interceptions.

While I’m not thrilled about Monte Kiffin’s age, I think his overarching defensive philosophy is going to benefit the Cowboys in a big way. The reason is that the Cowboys seem to be emphasizing speedover weight, switching to a 4-3 defense and loading up on undersized talent. Being undersized can be an advantage in today’s NFL. Teams already run too much as it is, so gearing up to stop the pass—thus forcing teams to run even more—is a smart move.

Let’s take a look back at “prototypical” Monte Kiffin players. I listed the average height and weight for Kiffin’s starters during his reign in Tampa Bay.

  • DT: 6-3, 295 pounds
  • DE: 6-3, 273 pounds
  • LB: 6-1, 230 pounds
  • S: 6-0, 207 pounds
  • CB: 6-0, 193 pounds

Remember, that was already a very undersized lineup. Now, take a look at the size of the Cowboys’ projected 2013 starters:

  • DT: 6-5, 304 pounds
  • DE: 6-4, 252 pounds
  • LB: 6-2, 238 pounds
  • S: 6-2, 217 pounds
  • CB: 6-0, 198 pounds

You can see that the Cowboys—who will boast one of the league’s smaller defensive units in 2013—are very comparable to Kiffin’s Tampa Bay defenses. They’re much longer along the line—an important trait for pass-rushers—including possessing more bulk inside. The ends are far lighter than what Kiffin has used in the past, but does anyone think DeMarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer are going to have problems stopping the run?

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys Coverage: Tyron Smith and More on Shotgun

At Dallas News, I continued my 2013 projections with left tackle Tyron Smith.

The Numbers

I tracked Smith as allowing only three sacks in 2012, but there’s evidence that he might have gotten a little lucky with that number. He actually allowed pressure on Tony Romo on 6.0 percent of his snaps in pass protection—around the same rate as Doug Free. He also committed 11 penalties—second-most on the team. However, only three of those penalties came after Week 6 of the season.

Smith was the Cowboys’ best run blocker in 2012, and it wasn’t even close. Dallas running backs averaged 4.47 YPC with Smith at the point-of-attack—well above the overall average of 3.56 YPC. Overall, I gave Smith a B- grade in my final 2012 scouting report.

What I Like

Smith went through a lot of off-field issues last season. It’s a great sign that he was not only able to turn in a decent campaign, but also improve substantially at a new position as the year progressed. We have to remember that this is a player who won’t turn 23 until the end of the season. At an age when many players are rookies, Smith could be dominant in his third year in the league.

What I Don’t Like

There’s not much to dislike about Smith’s future. His pressure rate was way too high in 2012, so that will need to improve. Based on league averages, a left tackle who yields as many pressures as Smith did last year typically gives up around nine sacks.

And I posted another analysis of Shotgun at NBC:

Below, I broke down the Cowboys’ 2012 Shotgun plays based on the down.

  • First Down: 32.5 percent
  • Second Down: 33.6 percent
  • Third/Fourth Down: 33.8 percent

The distribution is pretty incredible with nearly the exact same number of plays across the three downs (if we count third and fourth down together). So while Dallas uses Shotgun on the majority of their third down plays, it’s not like they never run it on first or second down.

I also broke down the Shotgun plays via quarter. The first number below is the percentage of total Shotgun plays that occurred in each quarter. The second number is the percentage of those plays that were on third down. So in the first quarter, the Cowboys ran 15.1 percent of their total Shotgun plays, but 54.9 percent of those first quarter plays were on third down.

  • First Quarter: 15.1 percent/54.9 percent
  • Second Quarter: 24.6 percent/32.8 percent
  • Third Quarter: 21.3 percent/33.6 percent
  • Fourth Quarter/Overtime: 39.0 percent/26.4 percent