The DC Times

A New Way to Look at the Cowboys, NFL, and Fantasy Football

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys Analysis: Sean Lee Projection, Reasons VY to Dallas Makes Sense

At NBC, I posted my 2013 projection for linebacker Sean Lee:

Last year, Lee recorded 58 tackles in just six games. Playing only 331 snaps, Lee’s tackle rate was 17.5 percent. That’s a remarkable number and, in all likelihood, Lee won’t be able to sustain it over the course of a full season. In comparison, he posted a 12.1 percent tackle rate in 2012.

The key to projecting Lee’s total tackles is figuring out how many snaps he’ll play. Most argue that Lee is injury prone, but most injuries seem to be the result of randomness. They happen so infrequently that it’s really difficult to tell if a player is really more susceptible to injuries than the average person or if he’s just unlucky. On top of that, even if we did label Lee as injury prone, injuries are rare enough that he’d still be likely to participate in a full season, or close to it.

With those things in mind, we can project Lee for a drop in tackle rate—probably somewhere around 14.0 percent—and around 925 snaps played. If those numbers hold up, Lee would total 130 tackles in 2013.

One of Lee’s most impressive traits is that he’s been really good in coverage despite possessing average athleticism. He’s not that fast and he’s pretty stiff in the hips, yet he’s always in the right position. In his limited 2012 action, Lee allowed 16 receptions on 20 attempts (80.0 percent) for 152 yards (7.6 YPA). The season prior—the one in which he played in 15 games—Lee allowed 50 catches on 63 attempts (79.4 percent) for 497 yards (7.9 YPA).

And at DallasCowboys.com, I suggested Vince Young might not be such a bad fit in Dallas:

6.8: Robert Griffin III’s YPC as a rookie ­– the highest mark in the NFL by nearly a yard.

Why would RGIII’s rushing prowess affect the Cowboys’ quarterback decisions? As Nick and Bryan pointed out, Young can give the defense a unique look in practice. With Griffin and possibly Michael Vick set to run read-option, the Cowboys need to be prepared to defend it. In RGIII’s first game against Dallas, he completed 19 of 27 passes for 304 yards and four touchdowns, and you can bet that much of that passing success was generated indirectly through Griffin’s ability to take off on the ground. Young can imitate Griffin and Vick in practice in a way that Kyle Orton simply can’t.

6.9: Young’s net-YPA during his final two years in Tennessee.

Young struggled with interceptions during his lone season in Philadelphia, but he was quietly really effective in 2009 and 2010 in Tennessee. Net-YPA is a stat that factors sack yards into a quarterback’s yards per attempt. Even though Young has taken too many sacks during his career, including on 7.7 percent of his passes in 2010, he’s still been very efficient as a passer.

A year after finishing in the top 12 in net-YPA in 2009, Young checked in at sixth in 2010. He also tossed 20 touchdowns to only 10 picks during that time, a ratio superior to Tony Romo’s career mark.

By Jonathan Bales

Top 4 Most Crucial Players on the Cowboys in 2013

At DallasCowboys.com, I put forth my top four most crucial (non-Romo) players in 2013.

Just Missed the Cut

  • Sean Lee/Bruce Carter: Lee and Carter are obviously talented, but the linebacker position isn’t of extreme importance relative to positions like defensive end and cornerback. Further, I think the Cowboys have decent depth with players like Justin DurantAlex Albright andErnie Sims.
  • Anthony Spencer: The Cowboys will undoubtedly have a rough time if either starting pass-rusher goes down, but Spencer’s production (certainly his ceiling production) is at least theoretically replaceable, whereas Ware’s probably isn’t.
  • DeMarco Murray: I do indeed think there’s a big talent gap between Murray and rookieJoseph Randle; a quick look at their weight-to-speed ratios will confirm that. However, running back is such a dependent position that Murray’s value, and that for any running back, is minimal. Murray will go as the offensive line goes.
  • Jason Witten: Some of you have asked how I can possibly claim that Witten’s play has been declining for years. This is how:

Now with two viable replacements, Witten’s importance, while still great, isn’t as monumental as it once was.

The Top 4

4. CB Morris Claiborne/Brandon Carr

Claiborne and Carr average 5-11 ½, 201 pounds – excellent size for cornerbacks. They both checked in as low-end No. 1 cornerbacks in 2012 by allowing an average of 1.19 yards per snap that they were in coverage.

The Cowboys have two talented cornerbacks sitting behind Claiborne and Carr in Orlando Scandrick and B.W. Webb, but their mean size is 5-10, 185 pounds, quite a difference. Scandrick and Webb could both theoretically play outside, but they’re certainly smaller than ideal, especially in Monte Kiffin’s scheme.

Plus, since defenses basically use nickel personnel as their base these days, a Claiborne or Carr injury would affect two starting positions, forcing Scandrick outside and a fourth-round rookie into the nickel spot.

3. DE DeMarcus Ware

You knew Ware would be on this list, it’s just a matter of how high. I resisted placing him higher because, entering his age 31 season, Ware is reaching the age when many pass-rushers see a steep decline in play. Much of Ware’s 2012 “struggles” can be attributed to injuries, but that’s also a part of aging; as players get older, their chances of injuring themselves increase.

Nonetheless, Ware offers a pass-rush threat the Cowboys simply don’t have elsewhere. He draws attention and forces defenses to game plan to stop him, opening things up for the rest of the line.

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: Why Morris Claiborne Will Be a True No. 1 CB in 2013

At DallasCowboys.com, I explained why Morris Claiborne will be a lockdown cornerback in 2013:

1. Claiborne was already pretty good in 2012.

A few weeks ago, I labeled Claiborne as one of my breakout players. The primary reason is that he actually played pretty well as a rookie in regards to the stats that predict future success. Whether it was due to his own struggles or former defensive coordinator Rob Ryan’s scheme, Claiborne didn’t make the big plays everyone anticipated. But that doesn’t mean he didn’t cover well:

“When analyzing cornerbacks, I like to look at yards per route. That metric doesn’t penalize cornerbacks for having good coverage. If they aren’t targeted on a particular play, they’re rewarded for good coverage. Claiborne actually ranked in the top 25 in the NFL in yards allowed if we take into account all of the snaps he was in coverage. That suggests that Claiborne, despite hauling in just one interception, played as a low-end No. 1 cornerback in his rookie season. As the targets increase, so will the picks.”

Claiborne was targeted only 69 times as a rookie, 18 fewer than veteran Brandon Carr. That’s a good sign and suggests Claiborne was in proper position most of the time.

2. He’s going to play more zone coverage.

Fair or not, Claiborne will be judged on his ability to secure interceptions in 2013. With a year of experience and a shift in defensive philosophy, he should be able to deliver. The Cowboys are going to play a lot more zone coverage this year than they did under Ryan, meaning Claiborne will be able to read the quarterback more often as opposed to having his back turned to the passer while running with his man. Zone cornerbacks have historically been able to make far more plays than those who play primarily man coverage for just this reason.

By Jonathan Bales

4 Contracts the Cowboys Will Need to Extend

My latest “Running the Numbers” examines four players the Cowboys will need to consider signing long-term:

In late October 2012, the Cowboys made a shrewd business decision that flew under the radar when they signed safety Barry Church to a contract extension. The move was made after Church had torn his Achilles’ tendon. So how in the world could locking Church up to a long-term deal be a smart move? Well, Church’s perceived worth was at its lowest point. The Cowboys knew they wanted to keep him in Dallas, so giving him a deal after he suffered a season-ending injury allowed the team to secure the maximum amount of value.

The best teams around the league continually employ such a strategy, signing players before they break out as opposed to waiting until they produce (thus forcing you to pay a premium). Such contract decisions are perhaps the top area in which advanced stats can aid teams; in predicting future stars before they become stars, organizations can more effectively manage their salary cap.

You can’t always “buy low” on players, however. Sometimes, you need to pay a player who has produced at a high level. However, the signing should never be because of that past production. Contracts aren’t rewards. They’re predictions. In signing a player long term, teams are effectively placing a bet on the future success of a player. The bigger the deal, the better he must play. It’s not enough to sign talented players; you need to sign them at the right prices.

That’s why age is such an important factor in contracts. A running back might very well produce quality numbers in his late-20s, but if you shell out big bucks to him in hopes that he’ll repeat his performance into his 30s, you’re going to get burned. With that said, let’s take a look at four players the Cowboys should at least consider signing long term.

1. Bruce Carter – Free Agent in 2015

Carter broke out somewhat last season, but he stilled played only 11 games. In his two-year career, Carter has totaled just 78 tackles, zero sacks, zero forced fumbles, zero fumble recoveries and zero interceptions. But we all know the 25-year-old is a really talented linebacker who has the potential to erupt as the Will in Monte Kiffin’s defense. The signs of success are there. The money to sign Carter might not be available with some other deals on the horizon, but he’s a player to monitor.

By Jonathan Bales

4 Breakout Candidates for Dallas

At DallasCowboys.com, I used stats to predict four breakout candidates for the Cowboys in 2013. Spoiler alert: Doug Free didn’t make the cut.

So what am I looking for in predicting a breakout? The primary thing I want to capitalize on is variance; I’m looking for players who have already showed signs of quality play but have been the victims of randomness, i.e. they’ve experienced bad luck. Examples of that might be a cornerback who breaks up 15 passes but doesn’t have an interception or a defensive end who has a bunch of quarterback pressures but few sacks (see Anthony Spencer circa 2011). If you can identify predictors of elite play, it’s pretty easy to subsequently make accurate predictions. When I used Spencer’s past pressure rates to project his 2012 sack total at nine, a number many ridiculed, it was one of the predictions in which I was most confident heading into the season.

Below, you’ll find the names of four players who underperformed (or got injured) in 2012. In many ways, their “breakouts” will come simply because they’re more likely to play to their potential. You can think of players as stocks, and I’m simply “buying” on those stocks whose price point is at a low and likely to “regress” upward.

1. LT Tyron Smith

One of the most important aspects of predicting a breakout is age. Spencer was a rarity for me in that I don’t normally project veteran players to break out. Instead, I’m looking for players on the rise, and that characterizes Smith perfectly.

When the Cowboys drafted Smith in 2011, he was just 20 years and four months old. Now 22 and six months old, Smith is entering his third NFL season at an age when many players are beginning their careers. Combined with his elite athleticism, Smith’s experience at such a young age is reason enough to predict a breakout.

Don’t be surprised to see Smith allow more sacks in 2013, though. I tracked him as yielding three sacks last year, but Pro Football Focus recorded 37 pressures. Based on historic pressure-to-sack ratios, Smith should have allowed closer to nine sacks last season. Nonetheless, Smith’s pressure rate should drop considerably in his third year. Expect him to allow in the range of 20 pressures and five sacks – quality numbers for a left tackle.

2. RT Jermey Parnell

Parnell was the “anti-Smith” in 2012, allowing way more sacks than he “should have.” I tracked Parnell as giving up five sacks, but he allowed pressure on Romo on just 4.2 percent of his 191 snaps in pass protection. Based on his play, Parnell’s most likely sack total was just two.

The question is whether or not Parnell will be starting in 2013. If given a fair shake to win the starting job, I don’t see any way he doesn’t beat out Doug Free. If that happens, Parnell’s partial 2012 play suggests he could have a surprisingly efficient season.

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: 4 Reasons DeMarco Murray Will Break Out in 2013

At DallasCowboys.com, I explored DeMarco Murray’s potential in 2013:

1. Murray might not even be “injury prone.”

A lot of what we view as “injury proneness” is just an illusion. Injuries are a low-frequency event and, for the most part, very random. That means we’d expect the distribution of injuries to be rather random as well, regardless of whether or not some players are more susceptible to injuries than others.

Nonetheless, we’d still expect a few players to be more susceptible to injuries than others. It makes sense that some people’s genetic makeup is such that they’re unlikely to get injured and/or likely to heal quickly after getting injured. But that doesn’t mean we can predict future injuries with any sort of accuracy.

Even if injury proneness does indeed exist, it would take quite a long time to discover whether or not a player is truly more susceptible to injuries than average. Imagine that the typical player has a 10 percent chance to get injured in a given season and an injury-prone player has a 20 percent chance to get hurt. Even if that’s the case, we’d still need a pretty substantial number of seasons to pass before we could claim with any sort of certainty whether or not a player’s injuries were because he’s injury-prone or if he just got unlucky.

Predicting injuries is kind of like projecting fumble recoveries. The events are rare, and thus susceptible to randomness. And while important, using past fumble recoveries (or injuries) to predict future ones is basically useless. That means Murray might be injury prone, or he might not, but the nine games he’s missed in two seasons really can’t help us make that determination.

2. He has game-breaking speed.

I’ve talked quite a bit about how the most predictive trait for NFL running backs is speed. There will always be Emmitt Smith and Alfred Morris outliers, but on a pretty consistent basis, the best backs are the fastest ones. At 213 pounds, Murray turned in a blazing 4.41 40-yard dash at the NFL Scouting Combine. He also had a 4.18 short shuttle and 10-4 broad jump, suggesting he’s truly an explosive athlete. We saw that on Murray’s 91-yard touchdown run against the Rams as a rookie. He possesses outstanding and borderline elite speed, especially for someone his size, and that’s important.

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: 4 Ways to Help a Running Game

At DallasCowboys.com, I proposed four ways the Cowboys can fix their running game. As you might have guessed, “blindly run it more often” didn’t make the list.

2. Pass the ball effectively.

When the Eagles were passing the ball more often than every other NFL team to start the millennium, they were frequently among the league’s most efficient rushing teams. Defenses were so worried about defending the Eagles’ passing offense that they conceded the run in many situations. There’s perhaps no easier way to open up running lanes for DeMarco Murray and Joseph Randle than to hit Dez Bryant deep downfield. Rushing and passing have a synergistic effect; rushing efficiently can set up the pass, but passing the ball with success can also open up the run, creating a cycle that’s very difficult to halt.

3. Run the ball with “11” personnel and from spread formations.

It seems obvious at first glance: If you want to pound the rock, bring in the big boys and line them up tight. While that might be the most effective direction to go in isolation, football is a game of competing minds. When the Cowboys go heavy, so does the defense. When they line up tight, so does the defense. Many times, such packages and formations simply increase the number of blocks the offense needs to make for a play to work.

The Cowboys have typically found the most success rushing from “11” personnel – three receivers, one running back, and one tight end. That’s probably because 1) they spread the field and 2) defenses bring in smaller nickel personnel. Last year, Dallas averaged 4.35 yards per carry (YPC) with “11” personnel, but only 3.31 YPC on all other rushes. When all is said and done, the rookie who could help the Cowboys’ rushing game the most might actually be Terrance Williams. If he can catch some passes and block well enough that the Cowboys feel comfortable using him even when they want to run the ball, the team should be able to improve their rushing efficiency.

Here’s the full post.

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: Projecting Escobar, Williams, and Randle in 2013

My latest “Running the Numbers” entry is a projection of the Cowboys’ skill position rookies. Here’s a preview on Williams:

WR Terrance Williams

The selection of Williams was intriguing for Dallas because his production will likely be inversely connected to that of Escobar in 2013. Since the two won’t be on the field together too often unless a starter gets injured, Williams’ production will increase as Escobar’s declines, and vice versa.

The ’Boys probably want to see Escobar on the field more than Williams simply because that would mean the team is winning more often. Last year, the Cowboys were forced into using at least three receivers on 56 percent of their snaps. That won’t happen again this year. Barring injury, it’s more likely that Williams will play around 45 percent of the Cowboys’ snaps. That would probably put him in the range of about 475 total plays.

Historically, Romo has targeted his No. 3 receiver on around 12 percent of snaps with at least three receivers on the field. There’s no reason to think that rate will change much in 2013, giving Williams 57 targets. No. 3 receivers often haul in a high percentage of their looks, usually around 65 percent. Williams’ rate could actually be a bit lower since he figures to see a lot of downfield targets. His catch rate will probably hover around 60 percent, but he could easily average 16.0 YPR. Those figures would give him 34 receptions for 544 yards. Like Escobar, Williams could help Dallas in the red zone as early as this year. With 34 catches, Williams should be able to find the end zone at least four times.

  • Final Projection: 34 receptions, 544 yards, 4 TDs

To the guy who commented “I have cut and pasted this idiots projection numbers, and saved them on a word document, to later review after the season”….

Please do. Maybe you could submit your projections for the players and we’ll see who is closer at the end of the year. Sound good?

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: Breaking Down DeVonte Holloman and Brandon Magee

At DallasCowboys.com, I broke down rookie linebackers DeVonte Holloman and Brandon Magee. Here’s the section on Magee:

Brandon Magee, Arizona State

Although Magee and Holloman played at different schools, their respective conferences, the Pac-12 and SEC, are comparable in quality. You could argue that we’d expect Magee’s stats to be better since the Pac-12 is a worse conference than the SEC, but don’t forget that Magee probably had worse teammates than Holloman. If we’re going to use the “SEC offensive linemen and running backs are better than those in the Pac-12” argument, then we also need to say that Holloman probably benefited from superior defensive linemen who could eat up blocks and allow him to make plays. In the end, it’s probably a wash, meaning we can at least make relative comparisons between the stats for the two prospects.

On a per-game basis, there appears to be a pretty substantial difference between Magee and Holloman. Take a look.

While Holloman’s production seemed to level out during his junior and senior seasons, Magee’s soared. The Arizona State linebacker ranked third in the entire Pac-12 in tackles last season. Meanwhile, Holloman ranked 58th in the SEC. Regardless of competition, Magee was a far more productive player than Holloman, especially when you consider that Magee also sacked the quarterback 6.5 times. Actually, Magee ranked in the top 15 in sacks for Pac-12 players at all positions.

It’s rather impressive that Magee managed to come back from a torn Achilles tendon in 2011 to dominate in 2012, but it also means that he’ll turn 23 years old early in his first professional season. I’ve mentioned that we really need to consider age when assessing prospects because it can help tell us if a player has maxed out on his potential or if his past play is only a fraction of what he can provide in the NFL.

And you can check out the full post at DallasCowboys.com.

By Jonathan Bales

Running the Numbers: Analytical View of Joseph Randle

At DallasCowboys.com, I broke down running back Joseph Randle’s pros and cons from a statistical perspective, including some analysis on player comps.

Each year prior to the draft, you can find dozens of scouting reports on each prospect. Many of them contain a “Player Comparison” section in which the writer compares the prospect to a current or former NFL player. I think these can be misleading, for two reasons. The first is that such a comparison can sometimes imply that a particular prospect has a rather narrow career outlook.

The truth is that most prospects have a very wide range of potential career paths, so we should really compare each to multiple similar players. The most comparable players can be weighted the strongest, but it would be wrong to insinuate that a particular player will without a doubt have a comparable career to someone else.

The second problem with most player comparisons is that they typically emphasize the wrong traits. As I’ve mentioned in the past, we should search to see which traits have been predictive of NFL success in the past, then weight the most important characteristics more heavily than those that haven’t been great predictors. If college receptions didn’t matter at all for running backs when predicting their futures, for example, there would be no reason to factor them into a search for comparable players. The most similar players are the ones who have near-matching numbers in the metrics that matter, i.e. those that can accurately predict a career.

However, how many times do you see player comparisons with two prospects who went to the same school? We saw that last week in Bryan Broaddus’s player comparison post; Broaddus asked some scouts around the league to compare the Cowboys’ draft picks with current NFL players. Two of the players, Travis Frederick and Terrance Williams, were provided with comps who played at their colleges. In these situations, it’s likely that the scouts were suffering from the availability heuristic – a mental shortcut through which people make judgments based on how easily they can think of examples. It might be easy to compare Williams to fellow Baylor wide receiver Josh Gordon, for example, but they’re pretty different players in regards to traits that appear to matter in the NFL. The fact that they both attended Baylor isn’t one of those important traits.

Let me be clear that NFL scouts are really good at what they do; for the most part, their player grades are pretty accurate, and many of them do it without the aid of analytics. But it’s really difficult, perhaps impossible, to generate meaningful comps just from memory. There are all kinds of biases involved in that sort of process. That’s really why we use data and advanced stats in the first place; no matter how great a scout’s memory or how well he knows a prospect, there’s no way he could recall a list of player comps faster or more accurately than a computer. In effect, algorithms can help us eliminate what we think we know to tell us what’s really there.

Head over to the team site to see why I’m not too high on Randle.