The DC Times

A New Way to Look at the Cowboys, NFL, and Fantasy Football

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys Analysis: Sean Lee Projection, Reasons VY to Dallas Makes Sense

At NBC, I posted my 2013 projection for linebacker Sean Lee:

Last year, Lee recorded 58 tackles in just six games. Playing only 331 snaps, Lee’s tackle rate was 17.5 percent. That’s a remarkable number and, in all likelihood, Lee won’t be able to sustain it over the course of a full season. In comparison, he posted a 12.1 percent tackle rate in 2012.

The key to projecting Lee’s total tackles is figuring out how many snaps he’ll play. Most argue that Lee is injury prone, but most injuries seem to be the result of randomness. They happen so infrequently that it’s really difficult to tell if a player is really more susceptible to injuries than the average person or if he’s just unlucky. On top of that, even if we did label Lee as injury prone, injuries are rare enough that he’d still be likely to participate in a full season, or close to it.

With those things in mind, we can project Lee for a drop in tackle rate—probably somewhere around 14.0 percent—and around 925 snaps played. If those numbers hold up, Lee would total 130 tackles in 2013.

One of Lee’s most impressive traits is that he’s been really good in coverage despite possessing average athleticism. He’s not that fast and he’s pretty stiff in the hips, yet he’s always in the right position. In his limited 2012 action, Lee allowed 16 receptions on 20 attempts (80.0 percent) for 152 yards (7.6 YPA). The season prior—the one in which he played in 15 games—Lee allowed 50 catches on 63 attempts (79.4 percent) for 497 yards (7.9 YPA).

And at DallasCowboys.com, I suggested Vince Young might not be such a bad fit in Dallas:

6.8: Robert Griffin III’s YPC as a rookie ­– the highest mark in the NFL by nearly a yard.

Why would RGIII’s rushing prowess affect the Cowboys’ quarterback decisions? As Nick and Bryan pointed out, Young can give the defense a unique look in practice. With Griffin and possibly Michael Vick set to run read-option, the Cowboys need to be prepared to defend it. In RGIII’s first game against Dallas, he completed 19 of 27 passes for 304 yards and four touchdowns, and you can bet that much of that passing success was generated indirectly through Griffin’s ability to take off on the ground. Young can imitate Griffin and Vick in practice in a way that Kyle Orton simply can’t.

6.9: Young’s net-YPA during his final two years in Tennessee.

Young struggled with interceptions during his lone season in Philadelphia, but he was quietly really effective in 2009 and 2010 in Tennessee. Net-YPA is a stat that factors sack yards into a quarterback’s yards per attempt. Even though Young has taken too many sacks during his career, including on 7.7 percent of his passes in 2010, he’s still been very efficient as a passer.

A year after finishing in the top 12 in net-YPA in 2009, Young checked in at sixth in 2010. He also tossed 20 touchdowns to only 10 picks during that time, a ratio superior to Tony Romo’s career mark.

By Jonathan Bales

Projecting Bruce Carter in 2013

At NBC, I projected linebacker Bruce Carter for the 2013 season:

Carter really has just one season of stats to examine, and he compiled them in just 11 games last year. The linebacker played 625 snaps in 2012, recording a tackle on 70 of them. That’s an 11.2 percent tackle rate. In comparison, Sean Lee’s tackle rate was 17.5 percent, although Carter’s number is still respectable.

In 2013, it’s certainly possible that Carter’s tackle rate jumps with the switch to the 4-3 defense. He’ll be playing outside—a more natural position than inside for the 240-pound linebacker. Carter will also play more snaps, assuming he remains healthy. If his rate of snaps per game remains steady, he’ll be looking at around 900 over the course of the season. At a 13.0 percent tackle rate, Carter would record 117 total tackles.

 

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys’ D needs to force turnovers through aggressive play

At NBC, I explained why defenses must use a more aggressive attack than they’ve ever employed before.

Not long ago, there was a lot of value in playing a conservative style of defense in the NFL. Offenses ran the ball way too much—they still do, but it’s getting better—and there wasn’t nearly as much scoring as in today’s game. That meant the value of each possession wasn’t all that great. For so long, offenses actually viewed punting as a quality option (even though it’s really a turnover). As long as they didn’t throw an interception or fumble the ball, all was good.

Fast-forward to today and we have a rookie quarterback in Robert Griffin III who broke the NFL’s single-season record for passer rating against the blitz. Not for a rookie—for any player ever. Today’s offenses are so much more high-powered than they once were. How about this stat: of the top nine individual seasons in terms of passing yards, all but one (Dan Marino in 1984) has come since 2008. Seven of the nine have been in the past two seasons!

And it’s getting even better for offenses. The rules are set up for them to exploit, and a recent wave of offensive innovation—think Jim Harbaugh and Chip Kelly types—means we’re going to see offenses continue to grow almost exponentially.

That means that defenses must adapt by playing more aggressively. Since offenses are scoring more often, the value of each possession has increased quite a bit.

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys Analysis: The Right Starters at Safety and ‘Going Light’ on Defense

At NBC, I posted an article detailing why I believe Barry Church and Matt Johnson to be the right men for the starting safety jobs.

Church and Johnson are considered the favorites to win the job, and for good reason. Church has shown glimpses of greatness in his limited work, totaling the highest tackle rate on the Cowboys over the past three seasons. He’s a big 6-2, 218-pound safety, but that doesn’t mean he’ll be a poor fit in Monte Kiffin’s scheme. Kiffin has said he wants to mimic what Seattle did last year, which was play a whole lot of Cover 3. In that defense, Church would play the “Kam Chancellor” role in the box—something he could potentially do quite well.

Johnson is a player without NFL experience, but one whom the numbers suggest is ready to start. Take a look at this comparison:

Johnson: 6-1, 215 pounds, 4.52 40-yard dash, 10-1 broad jump, 4.07 short shuttle, 6.84 three-cone drill, 38-inch vertical, 18 reps

Player X: 6-0, 214 pounds, 4.63 40-yard dash, 10-1 broad jump, 4.06 short shuttle, 6.78 three-cone drill, 38-inch vertical, 15 reps

Player X is 2013 first-round pick Kenny Vaccaro. Sometimes we think differently of players because of where they went to school, but Johnson has early-round athleticism. We’ll see if his play matches up.

I also proposed a very “undersized” defense for Dallas.

The shift to Monte Kiffin’s 4-3 defense means that the Cowboys were bound to bring in lighter players, but they’re likely going to field the lightest defense in the entire NFL in 2013. Take a look at the size of the projected starters in 2013:

DT: 6-5, 304 pounds
DE: 6-4, 252 pounds
LB: 6-2, 238 pounds
S: 6-2, 217 pounds
CB: 6-0, 198 pounds

They’re particularly light at defensive end. DeMarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer can both play the run, however, so perhaps Kiffin doesn’t have many concerns with starting one of the lightest pass-rushing duos in the NFL.

Some will argue that the Cowboys are leaving themselves susceptible to the run. That might be true, but it’s not necessarily a bad thing. Running is a sub-optimal play-calling strategy in most game situations, so forcing teams to run at times when they could pass—such as first-and-10—is a smart idea. The Cowboys might be vulnerable to the run, but it could end up working out in their favor.

Actually, I think the Cowboys should go as small as possible in almost all situations, daring teams to run. That could mean playing with nickel personnel in base situations. By lining up in nickel when an offense is utilizing base personnel, the Cowboys would be saying “if you want to beat us, you’ll have to continually run the ball down the field.” They say that continually getting run on is demoralizing, but I’d argue giving up an 80-yard touchdown pass is even worse.

By Jonathan Bales

Cowboys’ 2013 DT Rotation

A look at the Cowboys’ defensive tackle rotation in 2013:

Last year, I published an article predicting only 20 tackles and two sacks for Ratliff in 2012. He finished with 16 tackles and zero sacks. Many are predicting a rebound season for Ratliff, but this isn’t a defensive tackle in his mid-20s. Ratliff will be 32 years old when the season begins and his play has been deteriorating for years. I have a really strong feeling that the Cowboys are going to be disappointed with Ratliff’s play this year; you can’t just move a guy over a couple feet in a new scheme and think he’s all of a sudden going to revert to Pro Bowl form.

Further, the Cowboys should limit Hatcher’s reps as well. He was on the field for 784 snaps in 2012—twice that of any other defensive lineman. He’s the Cowboys’ top defensive tackle, but he’s entering the final year of his deal at age 31. In addition to an expected drop in efficiency, the Cowboys just need to see what they have in Sean Lissemore and Tyrone Crawford.

There will probably be somewhere in the neighborhood of 2,000 defensive tackle snaps to go around—1,000 for each starter. In giving Hatcher around 750 snaps and Ratliff about 500, the Cowboys could optimize their defensive tackle efficiency, leaving 750 total snaps to split up between Lissemore, Crawford, and perhaps even Ben Bass.

By Jonathan Bales

Improving the Cowboys’ Offense: More Dez, More DeMarco, Less Witten

At NBC, I’ve posted two articles on ways in which I’d improve the Cowboys’ offense. The first is how I’d distribute targets (ideally) in 2013:

Looking back at 2012, here’s how the Cowboys’ targets were distributed:

Jason Witten: 146
Other Tight Ends: 21
Dez Bryant: 137
Miles Austin: 115
Kevin Ogletree: 55
Other Receivers: 53
DeMarco Murray: 41
Felix Jones: 34
Other Running Backs: 31

That adds up to 633 aimed passes (excluding spikes and passes thrown away). Assuming that number remains steady in 2013, how should the Cowboys distribute the looks? Well, let’s take a look at the completion percentage and YPA to each player.

Witten: 75.3 percent, 7.1 YPA
Other Tight Ends: 76.2 percent, 6.7 YPA
Bryant: 67.2 percent, 10.1 YPA
Austin: 57.4 percent, 8.0 YPA
Ogletree: 58.2 percent, 7.9 YPA
Other Receivers: 64.2 percent, 6.8 YPA
Murray: 85.4 percent, 6.1 YPA
Jones: 73.5 percent, 7.7 YPA
Other Running Backs: 74.2 percent, 5.7 YPA

When we break it down like this, it’s pretty easy to see why it’s so vital to get the ball to Bryant. He totaled 2.1 YPA more than Austin while still catching nearly 70 percent of his targets. Using these numbers, let’s take a look at how the Cowboys’ target distribution should look in 2013. We’ll have to do a little guesswork for the rookies.

Witten: 110 (down 36)
Gavin Escobar/James Hanna: 60 (up 39)
Bryant: 163 (up 26)
Austin: 110 (down 5)
Terrance Williams/Other Receivers: 60 for Williams, 40 for others (down 8)
Murray: 50 (up 9)
Randle/Other Running Backs: 30 for Randle, 10 for other backs (down 25)

And why the Cowboys should lean heavily on DeMarco Murray:

Perhaps more important, I don’t think Murray’s potential injury proneness should affect his usage. It’s fine if the Cowboys want to limit his carries so he doesn’t wear down at the end of games, but that’s something they should do for any back.

On top of that, Murray is a far more talented player than Randle. Let’s take a look at the numbers:

Murray: 6-0, 215 pounds, 4.41 40-yard dash
Randle: 6-0, 204 pounds, 4.63 40-yard dash

Randle is a much leaner, slower back. That’s not good. Both have an upright running style, so if we’re going to label that as the cause of Murray’s injury woes, what does that say about the lighter Randle?

By Jonathan Bales

Why I’d Play Phil Costa at RG

At NBC, I proposed starting Phil Costa (or perhaps Ronald Leary) over Mackenzy Bernadeau at right guard.

In 2012, Bernadeau allowed a 3.2 percent pressure rate and six sacks—both poor numbers for an interior lineman. Bernadeau got beat by all types of defensive linemen, giving quarterback Tony Romo nowhere to step up to throw. In the running game, Bernadeau was even worse. The Cowboys averaged just 3.18 YPC with Bernadeau at the point-of-attack last year. While you might think the ‘Boys ran inside primarily in short-yardage and goal line situations, that’s not quite true. The average distance-to-go for a first down when the Cowboys ran behind Bernadeau was 7.78 yards—just below the average of 8.01 yards on all runs.

The problem, as many see it, is that the Cowboys don’t have a known commodity to step in for Bernadeau. I think this is a mistake made by coaches around the league—taking the “sure thing,” even if he’s not that good. But the Cowboys probably have a better option waiting behind Bernadeau, even if they’re not yet sure who it is.

In second-year man Ronald Leary and interior lineman Phil Costa, the Cowboys have two potential fill-ins for Bernadeau. Costa, who has guard experience, was sensational during his limited time at center in 2012. The coaches also really like what they have in undrafted free agent Leary, meaning the ‘Boys really have numbers on their side at the guard position. If they’re willing to hold an open competition for the starting right guard spot, chances are either Bernadeau, Leary, or Costa will step up. Based on 2012 play alone, Costa seems like he’d be the best fit.

By Jonathan Bales

Why I’d Start Jermey Parnell Over Doug Free

At NBC, I explained why I think Jermey Parnell should be the Cowboys’ starting right tackle in 2013.

But who could possibly play in Free’s place? Well, the Cowboys probably should have tried harder to upgrade the position, but of the choices on the roster right now, the starter should be Jermey Parnell. Let’s compare their 2012 stats. I tracked Free as allowing seven sacks in 674 snaps in pass protection—a 1.03 percent sack rate. Meanwhile, Parnell allowed five sacks in only 191 snaps in pass protection—a 2.6 percent sack rate.

So how could I possibly say Parnell was better than Free last year? Well, sacks are notoriously fluky, meaning they’re a really, really poor way to judge linemen. Instead, pressures—the times a lineman allowed his man to reach the quarterback, sack or not—are a better indicator of pass protection. And in 2012, Free gave up 41 pressures, compared to eight for Parnell. Those numbers equate to 6.1 percent and 4.2 percent pressure rates, respectively.

This is all statistical talk for a simple fact: based on how he played, Free got really lucky to allow just seven sacks last year, while Parnell was unlucky to allow five. I’ve found that a lineman’s sacks allowed typically add up to 25 percent of the pressures he’s yielded. That means Free’s most likely sack total in 2012 was 10, while Parnell’s was two.

By Jonathan Bales

Getting the Ball Deep to Dez Bryant

There’s absolutely nothing the Cowboys need to do more than find a way to get Dez Bryant the ball deep. Bryant broke out in 2013 only after the team made an obvious effort to ramp up his downdield targets. At NBC, I explored the situation:

Before the 2012 season, I wrote the following in my article Dez Bryant Will Be True No. 1 in 2012:

“Over the past two years, only 18.7 percent of Bryant’s targets came on passes that were thrown 20 or more yards. The playmaker has ranked only 51st and 54th in deep target rate over the past two years, according to Pro Football Focus. With Bryant’s undeniable ball skills, it’s a guarantee you’ll see his deep ball rate increase in 2012.”

And Bryant’s deep ball rate did increase. But only after the first three games (during which Bryant saw only one deep look). It’s no wonder it took Bryant a few weeks to break out. After it was all said and done, Bryant still ranked just 45th in the NFL in deep target rate in 2012. That’s not going to cut it.

So the top way the Cowboys can improve offensively in 2013 is to get the ball to Bryant deep pretty much any time he sees single coverage. He’s that good at fighting for the ball; he caught 50 percent of his deep looks in 2012—the second-highest mark for anyone with as many targets as him. Bryant’s 491 yards and five scores on deep touchdowns ranked him fourth and second in the NFL, respectively.

Check it out right here.

By Jonathan Bales

Grading James Hanna and Matt Johnson

My two latest faux draft grades are up at NBC. The first is on tight end James Hanna:

At 252 pounds, Hanna ran a 4.49 40-yard dash—a remarkably fast time for a tight end. Compare that to Escobar’s 4.84 40-yard dash. I’ve found that the 40-yard dash isn’t incredibly important for tight ends, but we’d never want someone who is slower if we can have a faster player. Plus, Hanna is so fast for his size that there aren’t a ton of comps out there for him. Good luck finding more than a handful of 250-pound players who run sub-4.5.

In addition, Hanna ran a 4.11 short shuttle—faster than most running backs. He also had a 36-inch vertical, 10-2 broad jump, and 6.76 three-cone drill. In comparison, Escobar had a 4.31 short shuttle, 32-inch vertical, 9-6 broad jump, and 7.07 three-cone drill. Simply put, Hanna is a better athlete in every sense of the word.

Re-Grade: Second Round

The other grade is for safety Matt Johnson:

The Cowboys have an enormous amount of confidence in safety Matt Johnson—so much so that fans have commented on numerous occasions that the team really knows nothing about him. Johnson—a rookie in 2012—has never played a snap in the NFL, yet he’s projected to be the Cowboys’ opening day starter at free safety.

Earlier this week, I broke down safety Barry Church as if he were a rookie and provided him with a fifth-round grade. Today, I’ll do the same for Johnson. Since Johnson has no NFL experience, however, the criteria on which I’m basing my grade are probably similar to those the Cowboys are using in assuming Johnson can play; he’s an athletic, explosive player with good size.

At 6-1, 215 pounds, Johnson is bulkier than the typical free safety. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, assuming Johnson can cover the deep middle. Based on his pre-draft measurables, there’s good reason to believe he can. Johnson ran as fast as a 4.52 40-yard dash at his Pro Day. Pro Day measurables aren’t standardized in the same way that they are for the NFL Scouting Combine, but it’s safe to say that Johnson is a sub-4.60 player. In addition, Johnson also recorded a 10-1 broad jump and 4.07 short shuttle. The latter number in particular is outstanding and shows that Johnson has short-area quickness.